Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
22nd Jan 2007, 12:10 PM #1WhiteCrow Guest
Celeb Reality Shows: Where do they go from here?
Well when Celebrity Big Brother and I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here came out in 2001, has-beens were lining up to try and revamp their popularity.
It certainly managed to give Claire Sweeney for instance, otherwise destined for soap star obscurity a new career - much to my wife's annoyance (it's her cousin).
But in recent years the celebs seem to be slowly keeping away, until now only the most desparate and obscure need apply. Last year CBB was won by the only non-Celebrity in there. And all too often instead of Celebs we're now getting "son/daughter/ex-partner" of Celebs.
Surely with the latest Celeb Big Brother and all the negative publicity combined with (hopefully) career destroying press, this is now the death of the Celeb Reality Show for a while? Or will it continue with ever more obscure "Celebs"?
-
22nd Jan 2007, 12:25 PM #2
Personally, I do hope that this spells the death-knell for these dire programmes, where, as Mr WhiteCrow points out, faded celebrities and people who are famous for... well, nothing more than being famous, come to attempt to revitalise their careers.
CBB has been the biggest joke this year, with the entrance of the biggest non-entity "celebrity" herself... Jade Goody.
I hope it's the end of it all... and if so - thank goodness!
Ant x
Watchers in the Fourth Dimension: A Doctor Who Podcast
Three Americans and a Brit attempt to watch their way through the entirety of Doctor Who
----
Latest Episode: The WOTAN Clan, discussing The War Machines
Available on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, and Podbean
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @watchers4d
-
22nd Jan 2007, 12:30 PM #3Dave Lewis Guest
I long for Celebrity Cannibal Island, where the likes of Ruth Madoc, Bradley from S Club, Donna Air, and Richard Blackwood are plonked on an island with no food, and the viewing public votes for who gets eaten on the live Friday scoffing show.
If it goes tits up, Rik Waller can be sent in after the third week to eat the lot of them.Last edited by Dave Lewis; 22nd Jan 2007 at 12:30 PM. Reason: There's a rat in me kitchen. Of course, there's nothing of the sort.
-
22nd Jan 2007, 1:14 PM #4
What one was Claire Sweeney on?
They'll continue as normal, they get the ratings (& the headlines), which is what matters.“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” - Gutle Schnaper Rothschild
-
22nd Jan 2007, 1:25 PM #5Wayne Guest
Sadly, Steve is right. They're driven by the media, which makes more people watch them, which in turn ensures more media manipulation, which keeps people watching... & so on.
The circle will never be broken as long as people keep watching. Even when the ratings plummeted for CBB, the scale of media attention to the whole Jade Goody debacle was so hugely out of proportion to it's importance that it pushed the ratings right back up again.
-
22nd Jan 2007, 1:31 PM #6
There are a number of unfair points made in the opening post. For a start, Claire Sweeney remained a highly paid television star in "Brookside" for two years AFTER her stint on "I'm A Celebrity", so to say she was "destined for soap star obscurity" at this point is incorrect.
Secondly, in the case of Chantelle Houghton the whole POINT was that she wasn't a celebrity, the challenge being to masquerade as one - and if that appears to represent the show makers proving your point, then that's to expect every celebrity to know of every other. The house, made up of people of all ages, could quite easily not recognise a member of a chart-topping girl band (who would in anyone's book be an eligable celeb) and this was the challenge. But I don't know what point you make with regards noting that she won. Once in the House, viewers vote to keep in the most likeable or interesting contestant, and as we all know likeability has no bearing on fame or claim to celebrity. And this is the key to why it doesn't REALLY matter how many "celebrities" actually appear on these things.
At the end of the day, we have a swipe at the celebrity status of these shows because it's an easy target - "ha! Call it Celebrity Big Brother, I've never even heard of her!". But what exactly is the complaint? If we are lampooning them for not getting bigger names, perhaps it's because a lot of these shows, especially "BB" and "I'm A Celeb" are not actually that fun to be on. That's the point - it's not a jolly for celebrities, it's a challenge involving living in an isolated environment. Commendably, some appear for the sake of that challenge (there have been a number of celebrities on both shows who clearly have a high enough profile and bank balance not to be doing it out of desperation), but essentially it's not a picnic, so of course you are going to get people doing it who need the money.
Yet at the end of the day, does it matter? It's the personalities that matter, and frequently the lesser-known Celebrities turn out to be as much entertainment as the major ones. In fact, experience has shown that those competing in the hunt for a higher profile, or who have been scarred by a previously-higher status one, face a tougher challenge, and therefore provide better viewing.
At the end of the day, the reason these shows are popular is because they are fun to watch. The entertainment value is never adversely affected by the shaky claim to "celebrity" of any of the contestants. And these days celebrity is big money, BECAUSE people buy "Heat" and "The News of the World" and "Hello" and for no other reason. Therefore you can't blame the "celebrities" in question from accepting a large cash amount to appear on a show which is going to boost their profile.
So who is the criticism of "Celebrity" shows full of d-listers actually aimed at? The program makers, for not being able to persaude people successful enough not to need to compete in a torturous endurance challenge to do so for the hell of it? The celebrities, for accepting large pay cheques to improve their profile and land presenting and media work afterwards? Or the public for simply watching a compelling television show? It seems to me that in a sense, everybody wins.
Si.
-
22nd Jan 2007, 1:39 PM #7They're driven by the media, which makes more people watch them
The point is, as viewers we're not trapped in some inescapable circle driven by The Sun, we're just exercising our right to watch what we anticipate we'll enjoy.
Si.
-
22nd Jan 2007, 2:26 PM #8
-
22nd Jan 2007, 3:05 PM #9Dave Lewis Guest
-
22nd Jan 2007, 3:56 PM #10WhiteCrow Guest
-
22nd Jan 2007, 4:41 PM #11Is that the spin-off series where Adrian, Joey, and Aveline joined Billy Smart's?
-
22nd Jan 2007, 11:16 PM #12WhiteCrow Guest
I've often said we have too many celebrities. Like any good farmer knows, when there is an overpopulation of vermin, I mean creatures trying to live off the same resources everyone suffers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cull
Culling is the process of selection of surplus animals from an animal population. In a wild population the selection is often done by destroying the animal immediately, in a domesticated situation the culling process involves selection and the selling of surplus stock. The selection may be done to improve breeding stock, for example for improved production of eggs or milk, or simply to control the group's population for the benefit of the environment and other species.
Last edited by WhiteCrow; 22nd Jan 2007 at 11:16 PM.
-
24th Aug 2007, 12:56 PM #13Pip Madeley Guest
Well, no CBB next year!
The 2008 series of Celebrity Big Brother is being axed in the wake of the race row which engulfed the show's last run, Channel 4 has confirmed. A decision about a return for the reality show in 2009 is expected to be made next year.
The move is also part of a shake-up of the broadcaster's evening schedule which will cull some factual shows. The celebrity version of the show has run for five series and lasts for three weeks at the beginning of the year.
Channel 4 head of programmes Julian Bellamy said: "After the race row, it was constantly in the press and part of the national conversation at a time when traditionally it was off our screens - it feels like it has never been away this year."
Speaking at the Edinburgh TV festival, Mr Bellamy added that resting the show "will benefit the format in the longer term as it will have a bit of breathing space". He denied that last year's race row, which centered on Jade Goody and Shilpa Shetty, had deterred celebrities from taking part in the next series. But he admitted there was a "general issue of supply and demand" which was making it harder to book celebrities.
The absence of Celebrity Big Brother will leave Channel 4 with 29 hours of programming to fill in January alone.
-
24th Aug 2007, 3:27 PM #14Wayne Guest
BB needs to go, next!
-
24th Aug 2007, 3:41 PM #15
Seconded!
Similar Threads
-
Rebel Flesh Control Pods to Become Reality?
By Rob McCow in forum Mr Smith, I Need You!Replies: 1Last Post: 11th Aug 2011, 7:44 AM -
Your Top Three Shows of 2009
By Rob McCow in forum Film and TelevisionReplies: 18Last Post: 20th Dec 2009, 6:29 PM -
Jessica Biel world's most dangerous celeb ...
By WhiteCrowNZ in forum Mr Smith, I Need You!Replies: 2Last Post: 25th Aug 2009, 11:54 AM -
Post Celeb BB Hello/OK predictions
By WhiteCrow in forum Film and TelevisionReplies: 5Last Post: 23rd Jan 2007, 1:34 PM -
ITV axes Love Island reality show
By Pip Madeley in forum Film and TelevisionReplies: 10Last Post: 24th Nov 2006, 7:59 PM
PSAudios 6.1. Bless You Doctor Who
[/URL] (Click for large version) Doctor Who A thrilling two-part adventure starring Brendan Jones & Paul Monk & Paul Monk Bless You,...
23rd Nov 2020, 3:02 PM